Launched in 2018, the objective of this project was to better understand how innovation developers perceive Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH).
We interviewed 31 participants working in Quebec and Ontario and trained in clinical sciences, engineering, industrial design, and/or entrepreneurship. To stimulate reflections on the topic, participants visited a visual repertoire developed by our team that contains 9 examples of innovations that are potentially responsible and that fall within one of the following categories of healthcare:
Participants also shared their perspective on the RIH conceptual framework, mainly the 5 value domains:
A 1st article describes how health innovators perceive RIH and underscores how “desirability” and “feasibility” go hand in hand. In other words, the implementation of RIH is first and foremost a pragmatic issue and not only a question of principles or moral sensibility.
A 2nd article focuses on the systemic obstacles confronting innovators who seek to develop eco-responsible health innovations. Potential solutions are discussed in order to transform what is currently defined as a double burden into a single duty to care.
A 3rd article examines the quality and safety dilemmas raised by open source and Do-It-Yourself health innovations. Policy recommendations are made to help patients safely benefit from these innovations that often meet their needs.
Project Lead: Lysanne Rivard